Good morning.

Friday in Whitewater will see scattered showers with a high of 54. Sunrise is 7:09 and sunset is 6:10 for 11 hours 1 minute of daylight. The moon is a waxing crescent with 31.2 percent of its visible disk illuminated.
On this day in 1780, the Great Hurricane of 1780 dissipates after its sixth day, killing between 20,000 and 24,000 residents of the Lesser Antilles.
This libertarian blogger has argued that local communities should decide for themselves whether to allow data centers in their towns. I’d not support a statewide moratorium. See FREE WHITEWATER posts on 1.13.26 concerning Wisconsin gubernatorial candidates’ views on data centers, on 1.14.26 about Microsoft’s view of Wisconsin data centers, and on 1.21.26 Assembly passage of limited data center regulations.
Gubernatorial candidate David Crowley has now pledged to repeal tax breaks for data centers. Crowley’s evolving position is sensible (and there’s no libertarian position that data centers deserve tax breaks):
Democratic gubernatorial candidate and Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley said he would sign a bill to repeal tax incentives for data centers if he’s elected, marking a change in his position on the issue.
Gov. Tony Evers and Wisconsin Republicans approved a provision during the 2023 state budget that exempts data center developers from paying sales and use taxes for the “sale of property and equipment to construct, renovate or operate data centers.” The policy is estimated to have already saved data center developers $1.5 billion.
However, as data centers have become increasingly unpopular, Democrats and Republicans alike have changed their minds on providing these subsidies.
A group of Republican lawmakers, some of whom voted for the budget that created the tax subsidies in 2023, introduced a bill earlier this month that would repeal the tax breaks, though the bill won’t go anywhere as the Legislature is out of session.
Crowley said he would “absolutely” sign that bill to repeal the tax subsidies if it were sent to him as governor during an event at the Overture Center on Wednesday evening.
“The fact that these tech companies are getting a billion dollars in tax breaks — it’s being delivered on the backs of hard-working families,” Crowley said. “I want to be very clear about my position. We’re going to be aggressive when it comes down to holding data centers to account, making sure that we protect our land, protect our water, have strict environmental standards, but also communities need to have a seat at the table.”
See Baylor Spears, Crowley says he would repeal data center tax subsidies, regulate AI and social media, Wisconsin Examiner, October 16, 2026.
(Obvious point and understatement: Regulation of AI or social media isn’t a position I’d readily take, and there are compelling constitutional objections to speech-related government regulations.)
Of data center tax breaks, however, there was never a good reason to extend those breaks to major corporate developers who have been able either to self-fund their projects or (as is far more likely) to find private backing.
If Tom Tiffany now finds these tax breaks objectionable, he needn’t look to David Crowley’s former position. Tiffany should begin his criticism with the many members of his own party in the Legislature who voted in favor of those tax breaks.
Aaron Sorkin on Mark Zuckerberg and ‘The Social Reckoning’ | Anatomy of a Scene:
What has Facebook wrought? That’s a central question in “The Social Reckoning,” the sort-of sequel to the 2010 drama “The Social Network.” The new film covers how the company’s growth ultimately opened the door to the spreading of misinformation on platforms owned by Meta.
One part of the movie follows a Wall Street Journal reporter (Jeremy Allen White), who works with a Facebook whistle-blower (Mikey Madison) to investigate the company. The other part takes place on a single day, when the Facebook chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, is preparing for congressional hearings.
In this scene, Zuckerberg (Jeremy Strong) is taking part in a mock hearing, working, sometimes begrudgingly, with a crisis public relations strategist named Raya (Wunmi Mosaku), who is coaching him on his answers. Also in the room is one of Zuckerberg’s antagonists, Charlie (Bill Burr), a former colleague who has since written a critical op-ed accusing Facebook of inadequate guardrails.
Discussing his film in an interview, the writer and director Aaron Sorkin said, “I didn’t want to make this about every Facebook issue that there is. I think if you make it about everything, it’s sort of the same as making it about nothing.”
He continued, “So I concentrated on two things: The fact that Facebook won’t fact-check political ads, and the change they made in their algorithm, without telling any of us, that is now feeding you content purposely to make you angry, because they know that that’s what you’re most likely to reshare.”





