Good morning.

Thursday in Whitewater will be cloudy with a high of 33. Sunrise is 7:04 and sunset is 5:13 for 10 hours 9 minutes of daytime. The moon is a waning gibbous with 84.5 percent of its visible disk illuminated.
On this day in 1919, Charlie Chaplin, Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks, and D. W. Griffith launch United Artists. (UA is now a label within MGM, an Amazon Company.)
On a first reading, the Whitewater Common Council unanimously approved a change to the city’s comprehensive plan for future land use and a zoning change for a possible residential development along Bluff Road. A video of the discussion appears above, and excerpts from the Whitewater Common Council packet appear below.
PROPOSAL:
Stonehaven Development, LLC seeks a Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map change from Highway Commercial to Single Family Residential. The requested amendment would allow for the development of 14 new single-family homes, providing much-needed housing within an established residential corridor.
[…]
This proposed rezoning aligns with existing land-use of the immediate area. All properties along East Bluff Road are currently developed with low-density housing. This land use change would provide improved compatibility with the nearby area, as compared to potential commercial developments. Overall, this proposed change is consistent with the city’s comprehensive plan, supports sustainable growth, and preserves the residential character of the neighborhood.Stonehaven Development, LLC seeks to rezone multiple parcels on Bluff Road from Highway Commercial to One-Family Residence-Small Lots. The requested amendment would allow for the development of 14 new single-family homes, providing much-needed housing within an established residential corridor.
This proposed rezoning aligns with existing land-use of the immediate area. All properties along East Bluff Road are currently zoned Single-Family Residence and are currently developed with low-density housing. This rezone would provide improved compatibility with the nearby area, as compared to potential commercial developments. Overall, this proposed rezoning is consistent with the city’s comprehensive plan, supports sustainable growth, and preserves the residential character of the neighborhood.
See Whitewater Common Council Agenda Packet (Feb. 3, 2026) Agenda Items 22 and 23.
The community has a choice on whether there will, practically, be more single-family homes in the city. Supporters of a project like this — and this libertarian blogger would be among those supporters — offer, by their support, a genuine and concrete option for the community.
Opponents, however, cannot expect that opposing each new proposal without offering a real and practical alternative will fulfill the community’s desire for more single-family homes. Merely objecting (not here, not now, etc.) doesn’t offer a useful (or compelling) alternative.
That’s the problem opponents of every housing project that comes along face. It’s not enough for them to say that they support programs in the abstract, with sometime and somewhere yet to be determined. They’ve not managed to get past the point of being mere opponents, so to speak.
Because the desire in this community for additional non-student residences is so strong, opponents’ efforts need to include agreement with at least some significant actual proposals and projects.
Always opposing, supporting only conceptually, or supporting only seldom simply doesn’t meet community desire and demand.
Wisconsin dog wins Westminster agility title:


