Good morning.

Thursday in Whitewater will see scattered afternoon showers with a high of 63. Sunrise is 6:47 and sunset is 7:14 for 12 hours 27 minutes of daytime. The moon is a waxing gibbous with 58.7 percent of its visible disk illuminated.
On this day in 1982, the groundbreaking ceremony for the Vietnam Veterans Memorial takes place in Washington, D.C.
Writing in The Bulwark, Bill Lueders wonders about A Blue Horizon in Wisconsin:
THERE’S SOMETHING HAPPENING here. What it is ain’t exactly clear. But at least some observers are seeing signs that the pivotal swing state of Wisconsin is shifting from purple to blue.
The upcoming April 7 election for a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court is shaping up to be a blowout win for the liberal contender, which would make it the third consecutive high-court contest to go the liberals’ way. This fall’s race to replace two-term Democratic Gov. Tony Evers seems to have a lopsided level of energy, with more than a half-dozen serious contenders on the Democratic side (to be narrowed to one in an August 11 primary), and just one serious contender among Republicans: Tom Tiffany, an acolyte of President Donald Trump currently serving in the U.S. House. And even given existing skewed electoral maps, the Dems have a fighting chance of flipping one or even two of the state’s eight congressional seats, for which Republicans now enjoy a six-to-two advantage.
Lueders considers the assessment of a former Republican executive director of the WISGOP on Wisconsin’s electoral fortunes:
TO GET A MORE NEUTRAL PERSPECTIVE, I spoke with Brandon Scholz, the former executive director of the Wisconsin Republican Party, who stopped being a Republican the day after the January 6th Capitol riot. Scholz, now an independent analyst and commentator, urged caution in attributing the legislature’s leadership exodus to concern over the upcoming election.
[…]Scholz also believes that proclamations that Wisconsin is turning from purple to blue are premature. State voters re-elected Republican U.S. Senator Ron Johnson in 2022 and picked Trump for president in both 2016 and 2024. If liberal Court of Appeals Judge Chris Taylor handily beats conservative Court of Appeals Judge Maria Lazar in the state’s April 7 Supreme Court election, “that’s one box to check”; if Democrats gain control of the state Senate this fall, that’s another. Finally, if one of the multiple Democratic candidates for governor beats Tiffany, “who will have a Trump endorsement and the mythical MAGA vote, which never shows up”—well, if all that happens, he thinks “you could put that check mark into maybe they’re moving from purple to blue.”
See Bill Lueders, A Blue Horizon in Wisconsin?, The Bulwark, March 24, 2026.
This Never Trump libertarian shares Scholz’s assessment: it’s too soon to tell if Wisconsin will move from purple to blue. (I do agree with the assessment that the Taylor-Lazar court race is effectively over: Lazar’s campaign is cooked. She is an underfunded candidate who made the mistake of leading with an anti-abortion position. Lazar’s views are sincerely held, but bringing them front-and-center only reminded others of a position that wins some votes in Wisconsin at the expense of many more.)
Lueders ends with a key observation about Trump:
Apparently, it is understood that it is impossible for a Republican to win a statewide race without Trump’s support. But it may also be that, in Wisconsin as elsewhere, winning with Trump’s support may prove to be equally difficult.
That’s it right there: a large coalition of opposition has both emerged and, crucially, solidified.
There’s a false — but self-serving — MAGA (authoritarian populist) theory that opponents of Trump are weak and intimidated. Jamelle Bouie writes about that MAGA view in a recent New York Times column:
The administration did not expect the public to be repelled by DOGE. It did not expect outrage over the treatment of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. It did not expect Democrats to respond to threats of partisan gerrymandering with their own push to wring as many Democratic seats as possible out of so-called blue states. The administration certainly did not expect the mass mobilizations against the deployment of National Guard troops and the use of ICE and Customs and Border Protection as a roving paramilitary force. Minnesota in particular appears to have caught them entirely off guard — a tendency toward docility, it seems, is their base-line assumption about everyone they oppose.
See Jamelle Bouie, Trump Cannot See That the Opposition Is Real, New York Times, March 25, 2026.
Bouie correctly notes the false assumption of Trump and his followers that they are strong, and everyone else is weak, submissive, and easily cowed.
At each autocratic and lawless action, however, Trump and his diehard followers find themselves facing a larger and more hardened opposition:
A growing faction of concerned citizens living in suburban communities across the United States — places once known for political moderation or even conservatism — are increasingly positioned on the front lines of the anti-Trump resistance. More than a year into the Republican president’s second term, the so-called “soccer moms” are becoming bona fide activists taking to their well-manicured streets to fight Trump and his allies.
The leftward lurch could cost Republicans control of Congress for the president’s final two years in office. It could also reshape the Democratic Party by elevating a fresh crop of fiery progressive candidates emboldened to push back against the Trump administration more aggressively than the establishment may prefer.
See Steve Peoples, ‘This is our fight’: Suburbanites embrace anti-Trump resistance ahead of No Kings protests, Associated Press, March 25, 2026.
It seems almost certain to this Never Trump libertarian blogger that the Democrats, the largest part of the coalition against Trump, will for their party choose “candidates emboldened to push back against the Trump administration more aggressively than the establishment may prefer.” The whole coalition, however, grows more hardened and more resistant to Trump each day.
It’s Trump who has earned — and intensified — this opposition. It is he who has made this opposition more implacable. As he is to blame for this many failures, so he is also responsible for an ever more hardened opposition.
How the Iran War Could Raise the Cost of Medicine, Plastics and Groceries:
Those worried about affordability should reject the man who supports tariffs and war. Those who complain about affordability while supporting that same man advance an incoherent, self-defeating position.




